<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opening the Scope of Employee Contribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/communications/opening-the-scope-of-employee-contribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/communications/opening-the-scope-of-employee-contribution/</link>
	<description>Information Society through the Prism of Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:51:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: weblawg.net: Information Society through the Prism of Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Information is the Good, the Currency, and the Era</title>
		<link>http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/communications/opening-the-scope-of-employee-contribution/comment-page-1/#comment-5993</link>
		<dc:creator>weblawg.net: Information Society through the Prism of Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Information is the Good, the Currency, and the Era</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/?p=227#comment-5993</guid>
		<description>[...] talked about this in my last post.  The warehouse where I spent a couple of summers showed some ability to “capitalize on the best [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] talked about this in my last post.  The warehouse where I spent a couple of summers showed some ability to “capitalize on the best [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/communications/opening-the-scope-of-employee-contribution/comment-page-1/#comment-5801</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/?p=227#comment-5801</guid>
		<description>I wish the higher-ups at LNC would think about this.  It seems they&#039;re aiming for the exact opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the higher-ups at LNC would think about this.  It seems they&#8217;re aiming for the exact opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/communications/opening-the-scope-of-employee-contribution/comment-page-1/#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/?p=227#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>That is one of the best management styles I&#039;ve ever seen. 

A question I have however, is...

How do you determine an employee&#039;s paycheck if the scope of that employee&#039;s work is constantly changing?

For instance, were you paid more when you helped with order processing (assuming that such task would have a greater value then your regular one)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one of the best management styles I&#8217;ve ever seen. </p>
<p>A question I have however, is&#8230;</p>
<p>How do you determine an employee&#8217;s paycheck if the scope of that employee&#8217;s work is constantly changing?</p>
<p>For instance, were you paid more when you helped with order processing (assuming that such task would have a greater value then your regular one)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa</title>
		<link>http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/communications/opening-the-scope-of-employee-contribution/comment-page-1/#comment-5760</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/?p=227#comment-5760</guid>
		<description>I knew you were a commy! :D But seriously, I was having a conversation about this general topic with a friend of mine from MDA. I should introduce you. You two should hit it off famously.
Corporate culture in general is too apt to create pathological relationships between management and talent (between everyone, really). I believe this is ... Read Moreespecially so in IP-related companies, where your talent may be idiot savant types (no offense, man :P) who are especially sensitive to their innovations being misunderstood/misused, wasted, or dismissed. And I believe every new generation of intellectuals just become more anti-corporate. They start out that way, and corps will have their work cut out for them to overcome that antipathy, without reinforcing it.
Think about it: the savants are highly capable, and highly networked (that is what the &quot;ant&quot; part means). Inviting a pheremone-laden member of the top-five hive into your corp, and then alienating him/her is just a very very bad idea.

So, anyway, my point is that corporate structure/culture needs a radical overhaul, IMO. If for no other reason than for self-interest.
Either that or they should hire, stupider more compliant, mostly harmless people like me :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew you were a commy! <img src='http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  But seriously, I was having a conversation about this general topic with a friend of mine from MDA. I should introduce you. You two should hit it off famously.<br />
Corporate culture in general is too apt to create pathological relationships between management and talent (between everyone, really). I believe this is &#8230; Read Moreespecially so in IP-related companies, where your talent may be idiot savant types (no offense, man <img src='http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ) who are especially sensitive to their innovations being misunderstood/misused, wasted, or dismissed. And I believe every new generation of intellectuals just become more anti-corporate. They start out that way, and corps will have their work cut out for them to overcome that antipathy, without reinforcing it.<br />
Think about it: the savants are highly capable, and highly networked (that is what the &#8220;ant&#8221; part means). Inviting a pheremone-laden member of the top-five hive into your corp, and then alienating him/her is just a very very bad idea.</p>
<p>So, anyway, my point is that corporate structure/culture needs a radical overhaul, IMO. If for no other reason than for self-interest.<br />
Either that or they should hire, stupider more compliant, mostly harmless people like me <img src='http://weblawg.costinmedia.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
